3.31.2007

Back Track

I'm going to try a little feature here on the bloggy blog about songs/albums that I like. Since I'm here in France with a (relatively) slow Internet connection, I've been somewhat isolated from new (American) music. As a result, I've delved into my vast -- and in many spots sparsely-listened -- music collection. I'll write here about songs I've re-discovered or re-considered, and try to give them more detail than they normally get.

To start off, I'll do a not-so-obscure song, by a not-so-obscure artist... I'll try to do better next time, but what can I say? I'm a sucker for the classics.

"Backstreets" - Bruce Springsteen

Born To Run represents the moment of Bruce Springsteen's arrival. From the harmonica flourish to open "Thunder Road" to the piano and strings uncertain cadence under Bruce's moans in "Jungleland," it's a classic. Alas, it's the second epic song on the album that gets ignored so often. "Backstreets," though, points the way most directly to the broodier Springsteen who was to follow.

"Backstreets" seems to fit the pattern of fellow epics "Thunder Road" and "Jungleland": piano theme to introduce the themes, then repeated by other instruments, followed by explosive, fist-pumping bridge, before fading into the sunset, all under the watchful, mournful cheerleading of the Boss. Yet, its topic of betrayal gives the first hint that the explosive beauty of Springsteen's dream-vision of escape onto the backstreets of the American continent -- into the dark fields of the republic, if you will allow some Gatsbyizing -- may double-cross us. We feel the deception of friendly C Major family chords and the ugly undertones they mask.

From the slow rumble building into the second uptake of the theme by the other instruments to that very opening line, "One soft infested summer" (what a line!), we understand that these otherwise cliched nostalgic glimpses are "infested," that their corruption has forced us to seek escape on the open road. The drum beat mimicking a heart beat on 3 leading into 4 keeps our fists pumping, but it's a little off. As he will later perform to great effect in "Born in the U.S.A." and on his entire The Rising album, Springsteen turns the heart-breaking anthem into an uneasy foot-tapping sing-along. That heart-thump drum beat lets us know that despite it all, these forgotten kids are still alive. There is pain in the past, but there is joy in survival.

As Greil Marcus said, "you’ve never heard anything like this before, but you understand it instantly." And that's just the thing. No emotion is elicited in this song that isn't found in, say, the Shangri-Las in "Out in the Streets." In fact, in many ways, this song is like a counterpart, a book-end on an era. Unlike "Thunder Road" or "Born to Run" or even "Jungleland," this song's possibility has already parted. Its primary flight is past. And all the howling betrayal we hear in the song is only further ironized as Springsteen mentions the "faithlessness" almost in passing, sliding it in between memories of old. It's like the pair of exes who keep talking about remembering the good times, but can't hide the deeper pains.

None of this is that profound, but Springsteen has never really been about profundity. For all the talk of Springsteen as heir to Dylan, his lyrics are nowhere near Dylan's cerebral linguistic gymnastics. Yet, in their simplicity, they speak a universal language that courses through our veins as rock'n'roll. When Springsteen wordlessly screams after "I hated him and I hated you went you went away," we feel the primal force of the jilted teenager in all of us.

One side note: I've often heard that Terry is meant to be an androgynous figure. After all there's no forced indication of gender, and some moments seem to indicate a masculinity in Terry ("trying to walk like the heroes we thought we had to be," for example). I'm not sold on the androgyny of the Terry character, but I think the ambiguity allows for further universal contact. Terry has become not a person so much as an empty shell upon which the singer has layered all his nostalgic energies.

When someone told me recently that no one he knows really likes Springsteen, I was dismayed but it seemed normal for the indie rock crowd to deride. All that unironic earnestness, dreaming about rock'n'roll giving Jersey kids salvation, was just too damned sincere for the post-punk era. Yet, here we are, and Springsteen's back. From the keyboard riffs in the Hold Steady to the inflected screams of Okkervil River, that old symbol of rock'n'roll corporatism has come back as the symbol of the purer rock'n'roll. "Backstreets" was the first step towards the darker Springsteen of Darkness on the Edge of Town and Nebraska and even to some extent Tunnel of Love and The River. Where "Born to Run"'s suicidal exuberance turns off the shoe-gazing crowd, "Backstreets" points the way back.

Sure, the song's not perfect. Sometimes those little organ ornaments make me want to punch Danny Federici, and the maudlin guitar solo could've been better fleshed out, but like much of Born to Run, these signs of amateurism would sound lame and weak-ass if not for the orchestrating, song-writing and singing might of Bruce Springsteen. He ain't the Boss for nothin'. Somehow Bruce's pathos rings truer than the emo wails of his lesser imitators. "Thunder Road" and "Born to Run" are without a doubt the choice cuts from this album. But damned if "Backstreets" isn't my favorite.

"Backstreets" at the Hammerstein, 1975:


Bruce Springsteen - Backstreets mp3

Morning (well... afternoon) thoughts and reads

A pretty goddamn neat instrument. Multi-user, interactive... next thing you know we'll be having holophonors.

An unusual and clever way to attack TurnItIn.com... "Copyright violation! You're stealing OUR papers! I never consented to adding my papers into a giant for-profit company's database!" Pretty sneaky. Volokh guesses that Turnitin "would and should win," but I'm not too sure.

The real reason the Bush Administration's attorney firings are important. I read this Salon feature yesterday, and now it's on DailyKos front page, so I figured it's worth the read.

{snip}

"Put simply, the Department of Justice lives on credibility. When a federal prosecutor sends FBI agents to your brother's house with an arrest warrant, demonstrating an intention to take away years of his liberty, separate him from his family, and take away his property, you and the public at large must have absolute confidence that the sole reason for those actions is that there was substantial evidence to suggest that your brother intentionally committed a federal crime. Everyone must have confidence that the prosecutor exercised his or her vast discretion in a neutral and nonpartisan pursuit of the facts and the law.

Being credible is like being pregnant -- you either are, or you aren't. If someone says they "kind of" believe what you say, they are really calling you a liar. Once you have given the public a reason to believe some of your decisions are improperly motivated, then they are going to question every decision you have made, or will make in the future. That is a natural and predictable phenomenon."

Just goes to show you that the Bush Administration's moral and ethical corruption isn't necessarily illegal. Most of the time, they play just in-bounds. But each lapse, from torture to extraordinary renditions to lobbying cronyism to fudging the Iraq evidence, and now, to attorney firings, destroys the credibility and good faith in which people hold the government. The loss of that good faith, that credibility has become the more glaring negative legacy from the Bush presidency (as opposed to our loss of civil rights... which is linked, but different).

Cheerleading: serious business. More than half of life-threatening womens' sports injuries come from cheerleading?? Hey, I've got an idea... how about some serious safety measures? Hockey players have pads; football players have pads. Get some helmets on these girls. Otherwise, get them the hell away from these dangerous-ass stunts.

Ugh, Charles Krauthammer
. How can you be so smart... yet so dumb? First off, the "War on Terrorism" in strategic terms is goofy to begin with, as terrorism is a tactic, but that's a battle for another day. The real weakness here is that Krauthammer seems unfazed about fighting a war for no justification other than "cuz we want to." He refers to the Democrats' desire for casus belli and morality as "nostalgia" (not unlike Gonzales referring to the Geneva Convention as "quaint"). Also, of COURSE al-Qaeda wants to keep the fighting in Iraq. It keeps American soldiers from actually, you know, capturing its leaders. "Yeah sure, stay in Iraq. That's where the REAL terrorists are. ::chortle chortle:: Allah be praised, I can't stop laughing at these morons!"

Homeland Security! KEEPING US SAFE!

("Checkpoint security screeners at Denver International Airport last month failed to find liquid explosives packed in carry-on luggage and also improvised explosive devices, or IED's, worn by undercover agents")

Health care! KEEPING US HEALTHY!
($12,000 for 15 minutes in a hospital)

Michelle Malkin! KEEPING BROWN PEOPLE SCARED!
("Can you sit down and type, "I will not submit to your will," to a hypothetical Arab teenager and not feel a little ... silly?")

Good thing my readership is small... otherwise, someone might threaten to kill me. And all this, right after Stop Cyberbullying Day. Violence is not the answer, friends!

Oh, come on. Sorority countersues about bad press. Hey, want to improve your image, DZ? Quit being such total bitches.

And, because baseball is here in less than a day and a half...



daaaaaaaaaaamn. are you ready?

3.30.2007

Are YOU on the list?

All three major papers front news about former Gonzales aide Kyle Sampson's testimony on the Hill, and all invariably point out that Sampson contradicts his boss's account of things several times. And this seems like a big deal. After all, it looks like Gonzales called a big press conference to deny that he had ever been in any meetings about the attorney firings, when, in fact, he had. Also, everyone is ballyhooing the line: "the decision makers in this case were the attorney general and the counsel to the president."

Here's my thing, though. Sampson mentions that he was the first to name-drop Patrick Fitzgerald as a potential firing target. But what about all the other names on the list? Who picked these names? And who chose to cover it up? (I think the answer to the 2nd one is clearly Gonzales.) Sure, he makes clear who the decision-makers were, but he never answered who did what.

BTW, did anyone catch video of the Sampson hearings? He looks... tired. Used up. Beat up. This is what happens when people are given too much power and too little oversight. The cocky guy from inter-departmental e-mails who was amped up to take down these attorneys is now just a regretful, sad man on C-Span, testifying to Congress. The founders were right, in that centering the responsibility of government in one place leads to abuse. It's not necessarily with bad intentions, but this is the natural result.

Now, the question is, how high did it go? Who made the list in the first place? And how long until the Bush Administration does the right thing and axes Al Gonzales?

Séséséséségolene!

Ségolene Royal... she may not have the policy, or the charisma, or the experience. But I'll be damned if she doesn't have a great song.



When Ségo (am i the only one who thinks "sonic the hedgehog" when i hear "sego"? ..probably) was in town, they had these giant speakers blasting the Ségo song. It has slowly wormed it's way into my brain and refuses to leave.

So now, I foist it upon you. Go to 0:50 for that irresistable chorus. Shit, if Kerry had a song like this, he totally would've won.

Sample lyrics (translation mine):

L’imaginer
A l’Elysée,
La plus belle fille du parti
Et la plus savoureuse aussi

C'est tout cela, Ségolène
Et plus que ça, Ségolène,
Elle est géniale, Ségolène

Et même Royal, Ségolène…
my translation:
Imagine it
At Elysee (palace... the french white house)
The most beautiful girl of the party
And also the tastiest (this one escapes me... "savoureuse" also means "juicy" like a piece of gossip, but that doesn't seem to fit either. maybe we are planning on cannibalizing her? mm.)

She's all this, Ségolène
And more than this,
Ségolène
She is great,
Ségolène
and even Royal (PUN! POW!),
Ségolène
A masterwork in political songwriting. A more sober French election entry may come later.

3.29.2007

Melt it down to make trailer parks

So, the St. Louis Cardinals are in a bit of a pickle. Not concerning the impending season or anything, but about a silly little thing they did. You know how the United Center has a giant statue of Michael Jordan in front? Well, the Cards commissioned this statue of Mark McGwire right after the 1998 home run chase, but with all the steroids hubbub, they've got a 3/4-sized (3/4-life because an 8 foot steroid-pumped Incredible Hulk might scare the kids) bronze Big Mac statue with nothing to do. So it sits, in the warehouse right next to the Ark of the Covenant and the Elephant Man's bones.

Hilarious quote:

"Weber is responsible for all the sculptures outside the stadium, and also has cast Thomas Jefferson and a few notable hunting dogs."
Actually, that's pretty much the Cards right there. Imagined Jeffersonian past, hick present. All in giant bronze statues.

I wonder if they'll ever put it up. All kidding aside, they should. It's their history. Just like when Sammy retires, I hope they retire his number at Wrigley.

Baseball starts Monday! Allons-y Cubs!

BREAK IT DOWN MC ROVE


..............................wow. i mean.... wow. just... wow.


karl rove drops it like it's hot at the correspondents' dinner.

hahaha i don't even know what to do. i am literally in fits of laughter. i demand that people the world over begin doing the karl rove dance.

he should be impeached just for that. goddamn.

This better not be like "I STILL Know What You Did Last Summer"

Aww daaaaaaamn. Trailer for 28 weeks later.

Zombies and shit. Anti-government paranoia. Gotta love it. Although I'll admit, this one looks quite a bit lamer than 28 Days, what with all the explosions, gunfire, and more typical zombie movie thrills.

Not that there's anything wrong with zombie thrills.

Re-entry pains

So here I am, back in the blogosphere, after God knows how many failed attempts. Mostly because no one really reads this kind of shit. But I feel like these days, I just need an outlet to put out all the dissociated nonsense in my head down on paper (or hypertext).

This will serve as a sort of aggregator of links and whatnot that I find compelling/hilarious/disturbing and give me some latitude for commentary. We'll see how it works.

Well, let's start things off with something that strikes me as odd: the presidential odds of Fred Thompson.

Is the theoconservative movement in America in such disarray that it really needs Fred Thompson to swoop in and save it from the evil clutches of John McCain and Rudy Giuliani? As an Obamaniac myself, I understand the appeal of the outsider candidate with great communication, but the potential shortcomings are clear enough (inexperience, most prominently). I guess I don't understand this bickering about getting a "bona fide conservative" candidate (just as I don't understand lefty bickering about Hillary's war vote or Obama's religiosity). By creating this unreasonable hurdles for candidates to jump over, they're going to get stuck with either a.) a far right candidate who has no chance of getting elected in the general, thanks to the Bush "compassionate conservative" debacle, or b.) a far right candidate who can't even get elected by Republican primary voters, thus further weakening the "base."

Sure, politics changes over time, and no doubt, America is still moving rightward. Just as Reagan-appointed judges aren't conservative enough to be Supreme Court justices, so is Reagan now essentially not conservative enough to be President. A California governor from godless Hollywood, whose tree-hugging prevented a major highway from being built, who raised taxes ceaselessly to (gasp!) balance the budget, and who had done nothing in the way of instituting religion into government... good luck getting that guy past the "bona fide conservative" peanut gallery. My point is, sitting there with a score-card waiting for "Mr. Right" (pun intended) to come along is counter-productive for your movement. Their undying fidelity to dogmatic ideology (btw, Dobson is already saying Thompson isn't a TRUE Christian... whatever that means) undermines what made their movement so powerful in the first place: pragmatism.

That said, nothing would make me happier than to watch the theocons marginalized. Lot of good they've done. Yeesh. Now, theolibs... that could be interesting.